There are ways to flee the gaslighter, to counter the gaslighter with equal force (fight fire with fire). But, there is only one real solution to the problem.
Gaslighters are true to their nature:
they take, though plans are often secretive
they blow up: anger and rage attacks abound
and they are driven by "rampant male force".
This male force is described by Carl Jung, famous psychiatrist, and Joseph Campbell, the noted mythologist, both of the last century, as the period where Male Thought and Control of others and society are dominant, and dominate over the Feminine.
This Male force has been in control since about the 3rd century BC, and before that, the Female force was in control of society. It's sort of like looking at the differences of the energy of President Merkel of Germany versus say Donald Trump, leaders in Iran, or the President of China, Xi Jinping.
The are opposite forces:
The male force is a culture of selfish competition that leads to disenfranchisement of others. This disenfranchisement leads to a culture of selfish competition.....it grows. Sometimes the gaslighter will be himself killed by those disenfranchised, but nevertheless, it grows:
Jung and Campbell said that ONLY THE DIVINE FEMININE WITHIN ALL OF US CAN SAVE US. The stated that the singular male dominant time has run it's course, and now, there must be the symbolic wedding of the masculine and feminine in order to save us. Otherwise, global warming, crime, drug violence, will kill us: we'll live out the stories found in so many apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic movies. Word War Z.
This wedding, a metaphor of the two parts, a more sane society would exist:
building cars would be combined with renewable resources
restrictive eco-tourism would save the last of our tropical rain forests
and so on.
This symbolic wedding, or the reappearance in society of Feminine forces, is peaking out slowly in the new millennium, but could soon gain a public viewing. Here are some very subtle examples of the Divine Feminine showing up, countering:
the lack of social values for others and the planet
countering the greed, lies, and attacks of the Gaslighter:
Gaslighters are true to their nature:
they take, though plans are often secretive
they blow up: anger and rage attacks abound
and they are driven by "rampant male force".
This male force is described by Carl Jung, famous psychiatrist, and Joseph Campbell, the noted mythologist, both of the last century, as the period where Male Thought and Control of others and society are dominant, and dominate over the Feminine.
This Male force has been in control since about the 3rd century BC, and before that, the Female force was in control of society. It's sort of like looking at the differences of the energy of President Merkel of Germany versus say Donald Trump, leaders in Iran, or the President of China, Xi Jinping.
The are opposite forces:
- on the Feminine side is:
- care for mother nature, animals, the planet
- connection with and tolerance of more peoples, different religions
- compassion for the humanity of others
- seeking deeper solutions to problems rather than creating more laws (today it was reported that 50 people were shot and killed in two weekend days in Chicago, and where is the President? Where is a solution to real problems: disenfranchisement.
- less killing machines: seeking peace, collaboration
- competition and one upping: less politicians and drug gangs killing each other
Having things and desire are not the problem with the Male Force: the problem is that the Male force on it's own TAKES FROM OTHERS AND FEELS ENTITLED TO DO SO
 |
| What is the final result of male force with only greed and entitlement? |
The male force is a culture of selfish competition that leads to disenfranchisement of others. This disenfranchisement leads to a culture of selfish competition.....it grows. Sometimes the gaslighter will be himself killed by those disenfranchised, but nevertheless, it grows:
- the culture of violence increases
- the culture of taking, greed, and riots and breaking into stores increases and is expected
- the culture of rape increases
- the culture of violence against the disenfranchised is tolerated and expected: kill women, gays, Muslims, in the US, is then different in other countries: in Pakistan kill Hindus, Gays, Turks, etc. The name or group of the lesser vilified and scapegoated simple adapts to a local culture, but it grows.
Jung and Campbell said that ONLY THE DIVINE FEMININE WITHIN ALL OF US CAN SAVE US. The stated that the singular male dominant time has run it's course, and now, there must be the symbolic wedding of the masculine and feminine in order to save us. Otherwise, global warming, crime, drug violence, will kill us: we'll live out the stories found in so many apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic movies. Word War Z.
 |
| Melania shows up gradually: there is the Divine Feminine in all of us |
This wedding, a metaphor of the two parts, a more sane society would exist:
building cars would be combined with renewable resources
restrictive eco-tourism would save the last of our tropical rain forests
and so on.
This symbolic wedding, or the reappearance in society of Feminine forces, is peaking out slowly in the new millennium, but could soon gain a public viewing. Here are some very subtle examples of the Divine Feminine showing up, countering:
the lack of social values for others and the planet
countering the greed, lies, and attacks of the Gaslighter:
 |
| Melania shows up gradually: there is the Divine Feminine in all of us |
How LeBron James and Melania Trump laid bare the contradictions in the Trump White House
 |
| Even Conway: Melania shows up gradually: there is the Divine Feminine in all of us |
Only the Divine Feminine can Win over the Gasligher
See LeBron James surprise Justin Timberlake
(CNN)Melania Trump's split with her husband over NBA superstar LeBron James is the most glaring example of a growing trend: The President's family and some top officials are adopting positions at odds with his most divisive statements.
The public feud between King James and the imperious President is on one level a personal and even ideological clash between two of the richest, most famous entertainers in American life whose outsize images outshine the confines of the roles they currently play.
But it is also offering new insight into the President's unashamed willingness to launch attacks that touch on the most sensitive fault lines of American life, like race and freedom of expression, that even some of those closest to him find difficult to publicly defend.
In recent days, Trump's daughter Ivanka has said she does not share her father's view that the press is the enemy of the people, only for the President to reinterpret her remarks for his 53 million Twitter followers. Trump's counselor Kellyanne Conway echoed the comments of the President's daughter Sunday. But only after Trump reinforced his attack in a way that made his daughter's personal damage control effort last week look tame by comparison.
"The Fake News hates me saying that they are the Enemy of the People only because they know it's TRUE. I am providing a great service by explaining this to the American People. They purposely cause great division & distrust. They can also cause War! They are very dangerous & sick!" Trump tweeted from his vacation at his golf resort in New Jersey.
Signs of a pattern
In another big disconnect last week, the top intelligence and foreign policy officials delivered a stark warning about Russian election interference, only for Trump to undermine it hours later by railing against the Russia "hoax."
Trump and his administration clash over Russia
The internal dynamics of the Trump family are notoriously tough to understand, and involve a complex mix of characters locked into the trust and loyalty dynamics of the most self-sufficient clans in American politics and business.
It could be that Trump's wife and daughter and some top aides are fighting a battle to safeguard their own principles and beliefs within the eye of the Trump storm and carefully chose areas where they can distance themselves from the President to protect their own identities.
A number of Trump's allies may also be taking steps to preserve their own reputations if they want to remain in the public eye -- both in business and in politics -- after the Trump presidency is over.
A more cynical interpretation of the events of recent days might be that Trump's relatives and officials, by adopting more mainstream positions on certain issues, are carrying out a political strategy that can complement the President's often wild interventions to please his base.
For instance, the more moderate stances of Melania and Ivanka Trump and their independent profiles could be seen as an effort to take the edge of the President's base-pleasing plays among suburban women voters, who will be crucial in the elections of 2018 and 2020.
Kellyanne Conway: 'I don't believe journalists are the enemy of the people'
The show of force of top national security officials at the White House last week makes it possible for the White House to argue that it does take election meddling seriously, even though it has no control over Trump's riffs on how it is all a Democratic "hoax."
Similarly, by adopting sanctions on Russia passed by Congress and allowing the sale of arms to Ukraine, the administration can argue that no White House has been tougher on Russia, despite Trump's constant and puzzling cozying up to President Vladimir Putin in public.
Still, such is the belligerent dominance of Trump's personality, it's quite possible that he will simply drown out any political positioning of those around him. There is often little momentum for action in Washington if a President is not on board -- one reason why many people doubt the impact of countermeasures against Russia's efforts to taint US democracy.
And Trump's enemies will argue that Ivanka Trump, Melania Trump and Conway are complicit by definition in the President's rhetoric and have shown little capacity to moderate his views.
The President's daughter, for instance, was at his side as he traveled to Tampa, Florida, for a Tuesday night rally in which he torched the media and his supporters jeered journalists.
At the very least, their differing positions reflect the reality that the President, as the fulcrum of the administration, is now sufficiently confident in his job that he is beyond influence from those around him even if they disagree with aspects of his rhetoric.
King Donald versus King James
The most jarring gap between Trump and those around him emerged this weekend, after the President's attack on the newest, most famous member of the Los Angeles Lakers, who has just opened a school in Akron, Ohio, and has in the past been critical of the President's views on race.
The President fired off a tweet at 10.37 p.m. ET on Friday night after CNN re-aired an interview with James.
"Lebron James was just interviewed by the dumbest man on television, Don Lemon. He made Lebron look smart, which isn't easy to do. I like Mike!" Trump tweeted.
Michael Jordan pushes back after Trump attacks LeBron James, Don Lemon
Trump's tweet will no doubt be justified by his supporters as fair game, since James has never shied from criticizing the President.
Last September for instance, James called the President a "bum" and said that it was a great honor for championship winning teams to go to the White House until he showed up.
But the tone of Trump's tweet appeared to have troubling racial undertones. It was the latest occasion in which the President has appeared to cast doubt on the intelligence of African-American public figures.
And by saying he preferred Michael Jordan to James, he was endorsing another star NBA athlete who has sometimes been criticized for not doing more in his career to highlight political, racial and social issues important to the black community. (Jordan later said through a spokeswoman that he supported James and that he's "doing an amazing job for his community," without directly addressing Trump's comment.)
Criticizing James after he had been publicizing his own public service also cast Trump in a poor light. And it may have forced the first lady's hand, given that community service is at the center of her "Be Best" campaign.
On Saturday, in the latest show of independence from the East Wing, her spokeswoman issued a statement that effectively distanced herself from her husband's remarks, even saying she would be open to visiting the school James opened.
"It looks like LeBron James is working to do good things on behalf of our next generation and just as she always has, the First Lady encourages everyone to have an open dialogue about issues facing children today," said the statement issued to CNN.
Trump targets the press
Trump's attacks on the media come as no surprise, and many Presidents have grumbled at their news coverage. But it's still shocking to see a President of the United States making such an unapologetic assault on the Fourth Estate as part of an apparent strategy of discrediting sources of power that contradict his own preferred versions of reality.
The President fired off new shots at the media at a rally in Ohio on Saturday night in a reminder that the full-fledged assault on the press will be a centerpiece of his midterm election campaign.
Last week, in an exchange with CNN's Jim Acosta, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders refused to decry Trump's mantra that the press is the enemy of the people, a statement that for many observers on both sides of the political spectrum has authoritarian overtones.
But Conway, who had a strong media profile before joining Trump's campaign in 2016 and joining him in the White House, took the opportunity to put her views on the record Sunday, while being careful not to openly criticize the President.
She said she thought the President was referring to "some reporters" who she said "aren't always telling the truth." But she later added as she walked a rhetorical tightrope, "I don't believe journalists are the enemy of the people."
CNN's Kate Bennett contributed to this report.
